Anniversaries are a good time for taking stock. The collapse of Soviet communism was a glorious moment. It remains so, despite mistakes and disappointments along the way. But today’s crisis tells us of the failings of a euphoric capitalism. Capitalism will not now perish, as communism did. But the signal ability of liberal democracy is to learn and adapt. We learnt from the 1930s. We must now learn the lessons of the 2000s.Good assignment for the final WC week, when matched to other thoughts about periodization.
Showing posts with label financial markets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label financial markets. Show all posts
Thursday, November 12, 2009
1989: End or Beginning?
Financial Times: "Victory in the Cold War was a Start as well as an Ending."
Labels:
capitalism,
Cold War,
communism,
financial markets,
periodization
Monday, October 19, 2009
financial cycles
In The Atlantic, article "The Quiet Coup" does a good job contextualizing the US's current crisis as the same one the IMF has dealt with in many emerging economies over the past decades. Basically, oligarchs gamble during a boom, get bailed out by the government, and the costs are pushed onto the lower classes until the whole system breaks down. Once the government is willing to cut loose at least some of its oligarchs (it's a game of musical chairs, really), then the IMF steps in with loans.
Other aspects that are well explained:
Other aspects that are well explained:
the American financial industry gained political power by amassing a kind of cultural capital—a belief system. Once, perhaps, what was good for General Motors was good for the country. Over the past decade, the attitude took hold that what was good for Wall Street was good for the country. The banking-and-securities industry has become one of the top contributors to political campaigns, but at the peak of its influence, it did not have to buy favors the way, for example, the tobacco companies or military contractors might have to. Instead, it benefited from the fact that Washington insiders already believed that large financial institutions and free-flowing capital markets were crucial to America’s position in the world.Plus, of course, the fact that everyone in charge of the Treasury is or was on the Goldman payroll.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
cost of the bailout
From the author of the upcoming book Bailout Nation. The bailout -- so far -- costs more than:
• Marshall Plan: Cost: $12.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $115.3 billionCOMBINED.
• Louisiana Purchase: Cost: $15 million, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $217 billion
• Race to the Moon: Cost: $36.4 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $237 billion
• S&L Crisis: Cost: $153 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $256 billion
• Korean War: Cost: $54 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $454 billion
• The New Deal: Cost: $32 billion (Est), Inflation Adjusted Cost: $500 billion (Est)
• Invasion of Iraq: Cost: $551b, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $597 billion
• Vietnam War: Cost: $111 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $698 billion
• NASA: Cost: $416.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $851.2 billion
Labels:
apocalypse,
bailout,
corruption,
financial markets
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)